Moreover, court cases are frequently perceived as a social disgrace, causing numerous individuals to steer clear of them entirely. This issue is further aggravated by corrupt police officers who manipulate cases, showing bias towards the influential, and coercing victims into retracting their complaints or filing them under inadequate or inaccurate sections in the FIR. Lack […]

The rise of this anti-feminist sentiment is concerning, as it poses a threat to the advancements made in promoting gender equality and women’s rights. It signifies a broader societal change where doubt towards women’s stories and legal protections is growing. Furthermore, it undermines the efforts to cultivate a culture of respect, understanding, and equal treatment.

Starting the path of advocacy is like entering a world of great duty, honor, and reliance. A legal education isn’t just a piece of paper; it represents a dedication to promoting fairness and aiding the community with honesty. Yet, moving from learning law to working in the courtroom reveals numerous obstacles that fresh advocates need

Technology’s rapid evolution has revolutionized the legal field, making a significant impact that cannot be ignored. With the ability to streamline processes and introduce fresh challenges, technology has completely changed the way legal professionals work. The legal realm faces a grave peril brought about by technology, specifically the widespread use of deep fake voice and

On May 1, a five-judge Constitution Bench, led by Justice S.K. Kaul, made a significant ruling in the case of Shilpa Sailesh v Varun Sreenivasan. This ruling breaks away from traditional family law and highlights the changing dynamics of divorce in Indian families. The key aspect of the judgment is the interpretation of Article 142

In India, constitutional amendments are categorized into three types based on the majority required for their enactment: Simple Majority, Special Majority, and Special Majority with State Ratification. Simple Majority amendments necessitate a majority of the members present and voting in each House of Parliament. These amendments typically address matters related to the administration and regulation

Two significant cases, Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) and E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu (1974), have set the precedent for Article 14. In these cases, the Supreme Court interpreted Article 14 extensively, emphasizing the principle of non-arbitrariness and asserting that the state must act fairly and reasonably in all its interactions

A woman in Uttar Pradesh’s Bareilly has been sentenced to four years and five months in jail for falsely accusing a man of rape. During the trial, she changed her statement and turned against the man. The court also fined her ₹ 5.88 lakh for causing him financial loss while he was in jail awaiting

The judiciary in India plays a crucial role in maintaining the balance of power among the three branches of government: the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary itself. Rooted in the Constitution, the Indian judiciary acts as the guardian of justice, protecting the rights and freedoms of its citizens. Central to the Indian judicial system